Lindbeck’s Approach to Theological Interpretation

Lindbeck's Approach to Theological Interpretation

In his book, The Nature of Doctrine: Religion and Theology in a Postliberal Age, Lindbeck introduces what he views as a more suitable approach to theology which he calls a cultural-linguistic approach to religion. For Lindbeck, this book came out of a growing dissatisfaction in the usual approaches to doctrine. The two approaches he was specifically dissatisfied with were the cognitive-propositional approach and the experiential-expressive approach.

Lindbeck presents his alternative to the two models that he calls the cultural-linguistic approach. Instead of approaching doctrine with either the lens of propositional truth or the religious experience, Lindbeck proposes that doctrine should be seen as a kind of language that provides a set of rules to help formulate truth and explain experience for the present generation. In other words doctrine must be understood within the context it was first given in order to then interpret it in the present context. It is important to learn the ‘language’ involving the Biblical narrative well enough to interpret and experience the Christian’s life and world in its terms.

I thought that Lindbeck was trying too hard to bring together the two poles of theology – the orthodox pole and the liberal pole. Lindbeck argues that by holding on to the cultural-linguistic approach, we avoid the pitfalls of the two polarizing views and become more accommodating. He says that holding on to doctrine as absolute truth has no credibility in a scientific world so the cognitive-proposition approach is not helpful to educated people. He also says that using the experiential-expressive approach is not helpful because it is not based on Scripture. So by arguing for the third approach he says that doctrine is not about truth claims, or human experience, but a set of rules to help us understand the Bible narrative and to apply it to one’s world. To me it seems like Lindbeck is trying to shape the liberal church by bringing it closer to the Bible narrative and he is shaping the orthodox church by causing it to see truth as relative. To me this is not an acceptable way to approach doctrine because it denies that absolute truth exists.

However in reading this book, I have come to appreciate what Lindbeck is trying to present. My conclusion is that our approach to doctrine should encompass all three approaches. We need to have a cognitive-approach to doctrine to understand truth that is universal and absolute and truth that is cultural; we need the experiential-expressive approach to understand how truth works in our lives and we need the cultural-linguistic approach to apply the truth to one’s life and behavior in the world we live in.

One Comment on “Lindbeck’s Approach to Theological Interpretation

  1. Um yes… One of the “truths” I obtained from the study of Philosophy was that there are no absolute truths and almost any theory can be refuted… Which is why anyone having studied the subject becomes disillusioned and suicidal!!!
    A couple of years ago I joined Britains DNA to help trace the ancestry from deep in the past starting with the first human tribes to come out of Africa. It has been discovered that the whole human race may have come from one genetically modified female with itchy feet who persuaded her tribe to immigrate from the forests to the plains when the climate started to change.
    The story of their migration following the rivers up to the Sea of Reeds is very like the Genesis story of Moses escaping across the land bridge at the top of the Nile. In fact tracing the migrations up through Israel and out into the rest of the land masses is fascinating, especially as it has been carried out by tracing genetic markers on the DNA strings. My mitochondrial marker found its way to the Indus Valley and is unique to that area… It is rare in Britain but plentiful in Finland and of all things Pakistan!!!
    Now what if the early stories are based on facts handed down and then because of the nature of story telling embroidered so that people remembered them…. the Jewish interpretation suggests that the whole book is the story of God working through his chosen people… it is Gods story not the story of the Jews… It has to be seen as a whole concept … The big picture… Like the distribution of the DNA code throughout humanity.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

The Hot Rev's Prattle

Steering people towards an authentic faith

Ray Ferrer - Emotion on Canvas

** OFFICIAL Site of Artist Ray Ferrer **


This site is the bee's knees

Attenti al Lupo

Line Of The Week

Miscellaneous Utterings From Best Friends

Unbound Boxes Limping Gods

The writer gives life to a story, the reader keeps it alive.

brandon andress

the church of the future is around a table

Indie Hero

Brian Marggraf, Author of Dream Brother: A Novel, Independent publishing advocate, New York City dweller

Full Of Roses Inspirationals

Christian inspirational photography and poetry

A Holistic Journey

Finding my way back out of motherhood -- while mothering

The Reformed Conservative

Restoring Civility to Conversation & Conservatism to Theology


This site is the cat’s pajamas


Let your children believe.

Celebrating Christ | Engaging Culture | Transforming Lives


A topnotch site


Spirituality, Sustainability, Hospitality and Community

Red Letter Christians

Staying true to the foundation of combining Jesus and justice, Red Letter Christians mobilizes individuals into a movement of believers who live out Jesus’ counter-cultural teachings.

%d bloggers like this: